[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updated SRFI-108
Per Bothner scripsit:
> I'm currently leaning towards $<<$ and $>>$. Thus
> &URI{http://&[example-host]/}
> would be read as:
> ($construct$:URI "http://" $<<$ example-host $>>$ "/")
+1
--
There is no real going back. Though I John Cowan
may come to the Shire, it will not seem cowan@xxxxxxxx
the same; for I shall not be the same. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
I am wounded with knife, sting, and tooth,
and a long burden. Where shall I find rest? --Frodo