[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: updated SRFI-108



Per Bothner scripsit:

> I'm currently leaning towards $<<$ and $>>$.  Thus
>     &URI{http://&[example-host]/}
> would be read as:
>    ($construct$:URI "http://"; $<<$ example-host $>>$ "/")

+1

-- 
There is no real going back.  Though I          John Cowan
may come to the Shire, it will not seem         cowan@xxxxxxxx
the same; for I shall not be the same.          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
I am wounded with knife, sting, and tooth,
and a long burden.  Where shall I find rest?           --Frodo