[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each
On 10/17/2013 01:25 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
I see for-each in the reference implementation and test suite.
Aargh. Now I do too, even though I searched through the file
multiple times. Perhaps a combination of a cut-and-paste error
into my local copy and confusion when scanning the web version.
Also note that the PLT version in reference  does seem to be
missing ra:for-each, even though it has ra:map: