[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: a counter proposal

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 10 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 10 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <srfi-10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 11:05 AM
Subject: a counter proposal

> ...
> Why not have
>   #,(...)
> read as
>   (force (delay (...)))
> just as `(...) reads as (quasiquote ...)?  This avoids the need to
> preregister constructors and it preserves the separation between
> syntax and semantics.  A program can be evaluated in one fell swoop.

I woud only suggest to read #,(...) as (hash-comma ...) and
(define-syntax hash-comma (syntax-rules () ((_ ?x) (force (delay ?x)))).
This would expose only one name to name capture -related hazards of
read-macro expansion. It's a pity that this form won't work inside
quoted constants, though...