[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 99 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 99 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: srfi-99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
From: Ray Blaak <blaak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:13:03 -0700
Delivered-to: srfi-99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <488B75FF.7050609@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <488B75FF.7050609@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)

Ray Blaak wrote:

I am ignorant of some of the passed record systems referenced, so"rtd" does not seem obvious to me. "Record Type Data"?

Ok:

<definition>-> <record type definition>Nevertheless, my suggestion still stands. For all the helper recordmethods and forms, something that more directly reads as being recordrelated would be better than "rtd".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
  - From: David Van Horn
- Re: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
  - From: David Van Horn

References:
- use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
  - From: Ray Blaak

Prev by Date: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
Next by Date: Re: I would tone down some of the language
Previous by thread: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
Next by thread: Re: use "rec" instead of "rtd"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread