[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: lucier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
From: William D Clinger <will@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 16:52:21 -0400
Cc: a.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cowan@xxxxxxxx, sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Brad Lucier wrote:
> 754 is for binary arithmetic; 854 is for other bases (typically  
> decimal).

Sorry.  I thought IEEE 754 requires double precision,
but it requires only single.

Will

Prev by Date: Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
Next by Date: Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
Previous by thread: Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
Next by thread: Re: Fresh syntax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread