[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: cowan@xxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
From: William D Clinger <will@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:43:48 -0400
Cc: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

John Cowan wrote:
> I agree with all these points; however, I also agree that
> the existing "fixnum" and "fx" prefixes are un-mnemonic
> and too easily confused.

Do you like the fxringXXX convention Marc Feeley
suggested, or would you prefer some other convention?

Will

Follow-Ups:
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  - From: John Cowan
- Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
  - From: Andre van Tonder

Prev by Date: Re: SRFI-77 with more than one flonum representation
Next by Date: Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
Previous by thread: Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
Next by thread: Re: fixnumXXX and fxXXX names, and other things
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread