This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 77 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 77 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> It is an explanation of why your appeal to tradition is ill-founded; >> the tradition actually points the opposite way. > > There is no tradition in not providing a read syntax for "error > objects". Really? Can you give me some pointers to the Lisp systems which do provide read syntax for all the error objects they have?