[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what about dropping rest-lists?
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 71 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 71 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
...and reality caught up again: There
are no other cases covered by the
"."-notation because "."
cannot be followed by two syntactic elements,
so the entire idea of (let ((x1 . x2+
expr)) body) is bogus.
I still like Neil's (rest x) idea for
it's readability, but it does not cover the
empty case.
Sebastian.