[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Optional arguments

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 69 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 69 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.



On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> I just fell over
>     Procedure: make-hash-table [ equal? ] [ hash ] [ sizehint ] -> 
>     hash-table
> shouldn't this be
>     Procedure: make-hash-table [[equal?] [[hash] [[sizehint]]]] -> 
>     hash-table

Or 
     Procedure: make-hash-table [ equal? [ hash [ sizehint ]]] -> 
     hash-table

Answers: probably yes.  I'll fix this in next revision.

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>   "Hash tables have no intrinsic order for these associations, and
>    allow key lookup and destructive updating in amortised constant time."
> 
> How about adding "provided a good hash functions is used"?

I forgot to add the mention there.  Will fix.

Panu

-- 
personal contact: atehwa@xxxxxx, +35841 5323835, +3589 85619369
work contact: pkalliok@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, +35850 3678003
kotisivu (henkkoht):	http://www.iki.fi/atehwa/
homepage (technical):	http://sange.fi/~atehwa/