This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 57 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 57 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
I think `record->sexp' is actually pretty handy (for example for debugging purposes).I vehemently suggest to leave it in.
Noted.
That leads me to another issue: What about separate compilation? The problem is here that I might have two source-files, using the same record type, compiled separately in two different instances of the compiler. How can I make sure that ; a.scm (define-record foo ...) ; b.scm (define-record foo ...) Refer to the same type?
Good question. Hard to answer, though, without a specification of what spearate compilation is... :)
Andre