This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 53 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 53 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Ken Dickey wrote: > Given SRFIs 12/34/35, I don't think a new form is needed. Perhaps some > syntactic sugar: > with-syntax-exception > with-syntax-error > Where the with-* form checks for syntax-exception/error/condition and handles > or passes through as appropriate. I'm not exactly sure what you're suggesting here, so I'm guessing exception system at the syntactic computation level. I think a complete exception mechanism for syntactic computations is overdoing it a _little_ much in this initial SRFI for them. Leave that for a later SRFI, and I think a SYNTAX-DEBUG-MESSAGE is plenty for now.