This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 50 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 50 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
> From: bear <bear@xxxxxxxxx>
> >The lock/unlock pattern can solve it -- not in the general case but in
> >a useful way -- and is quite portable.
> This is true -- but impossible within the context of the current draft of
> the SRFI because there is no call to hang the unlock() method on.
I don't understand. The unlock() should be an explicit part of the
FFI (when/if r/w-sharing-semantics string extraction is added).
-t