[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: strings draft

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 50 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 50 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Alex Shinn <foof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: strings draft
From: tb@xxxxxxxxxx (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 22 Jan 2004 18:42:52 -0800
Cc: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <878yjztmss.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200401220511.VAA18432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87isj3pg98.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <878yjztmss.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Alex Shinn <foof@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> And/or use an implicit (current-locale) as in my response on c.l.s. (I'm
> responding there on the general R6RS issues, not commenting on the C
> FFI).

An implicit usage is bad, for exactly the same way as it is bad in
eval.  

Thomas

References:
- strings draft
  - From: Tom Lord
- Re: strings draft
  - From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: strings draft
  - From: Alex Shinn

Prev by Date: Re: strings draft
Next by Date: Re: strings draft
Previous by thread: Re: strings draft
Next by thread: Re: strings draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread