This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 5 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 5 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes: > This looks good. I'd personally replace some of the dotted pairs by > ellipsis constructions, as attached. It would be good if one version > or the other were part of the SRFI. Let me know if you agree, and > I'll stick it into the draft. > > [version favoring ellipses over dots > which sounds like a no-op but ain't :) ] Thanks, that's grand, let's use yours. I prefer the less powerful but more general-purpose dot operator when applicable, but it seems that ellipses and unquote-splicing are favored in the wider code pool. As I see it, this is a cool forum, and a little consistency will probably go far. Good to see that overall structure didn't need to be changed, I haven't done much templating. Neat in their way, but I got waaaay turned off veeeery early on by the lack of non-hygienic bindings. Got any dirty pre-emptive hacks for dirty template bindings? Otherwise I'm likely to waste time mucking about with eval in a couple SRFIs I've held off in anticipation of requests for R5RS code. Regards, [Ag] Andy Gaynor silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx