status: final (1999-04-26)
keywords: Binding
library name: let
The named-let incarnation of the
let form has two slight inconsistencies with the
define form. As defined, the let form makes no
accommodation for rest arguments, an issue of functionality and
consistency. As defined, the let form does not accommodate
signature-style syntax, an issue of aesthetics and consistency. Both
issues are addressed here in a manner which is compatible with the
traditional let form but for minor extensions.