status: final (1999-04-26)
keywords: Binding
library name: let
The named-let incarnation of the
let
form has two slight inconsistencies with the
define
form. As defined, the let
form makes no
accommodation for rest arguments, an issue of functionality and
consistency. As defined, the let
form does not accommodate
signature-style syntax, an issue of aesthetics and consistency. Both
issues are addressed here in a manner which is compatible with the
traditional let
form but for minor extensions.