[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: corrections to reference implementation

William D Clinger <will@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The current reference implementation of SRFI 43 blows up on
> several trivial cases that, according to the specification
> itself, would appear to be legal.  Examples:
>     (vector-copy '#() 0)
>     (vector-copy! (vector) 0 '#())
>     (vector-reverse-copy! (vector) 0 '#())
> All three problems arise from premature index checking.  I have
> rewritten those procedures to match the SRFI's specification:
> https://trac.ccs.neu.edu/trac/larceny/browser/trunk/larceny_src/lib/SRFI/srfi-43.sch

Thanks for the fixes - Taylor Campbell has reviewed them (thanks,
Taylor!), and I've checked them into the copy on srfi.schemers.org.

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla