[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Much simpler leak-free implementation possible?

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 40 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 40 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Andre van Tonder wrote:

> For what it's worth, I have adapted the CPS-style solution to a direct-style
> delay and force (below), that has the correct tail call behavior and should
> work well in Schemes with an efficient implementation of call/cc 

I withdraw this.  Found a bug (sorry)...