[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Almost OT, < and <=

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 32 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 32 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: "'felix'" <felixundduni@xxxxxxxxxx>, <srfi-32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Almost OT, < and <=
From: "Ben Goetter (in the field)" <goetter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 01:32:14 -0700
Delivered-to: srfi-32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <002a01c2321a$d5eea300$d701a8c0@foxi>
Organization: The Mazama Network

> On which platforms might it matter, then?

MIPS, FPGA; most bignum impls.  For a sufficiently small definition
of "matter."

> Can you give a code- example

Either a wasted cycle bothers you, or else it doesn't bother you.

Never mind the poor wasted electrons feeding the gates for those
extra microcoded flag bit tests.  Alas!

References:
- Re: Almost OT, < and <=
  - From: felix

Prev by Date: Re: Almost OT, < and <=
Next by Date: RE: Almost OT, < and <=
Previous by thread: Re: Almost OT, < and <=
Next by thread: Re: Almost OT, < and <=
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread