This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 17 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 17 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We have no supported way of setting the setter associated with a > getter, but rather have a constructor > > make-getter-with-setter GETTER SETTER > > with corresponding selector > > setter GETTER-WITH-SETTER Sorry, it's make-procedure-with-setter PROCEDURE SETTER procedure PWS setter PWS (I'm very busy with other things right now, and don't really have time to spend on this discussion, even though I'd like to.)