This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 15 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 15 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
> Olin writes: >> This seems like a waste of a SRFI to me. >>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 1999 12:02:06 -0500, Lars Thomas Hansen <lth@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > To each his own. I guess the editors felt differently. Not necessarily. The editors try to maintain quality and consistency, but aren't allowed to officially *feel* anything about the appropriateness of a proposal. Personally, I'd like to not have too many SRFIs that are unused because they were too short-sighted. I'd be a lot happier if all of the SRFIs were such that most implementers felt they were appropriate (or even essential) to support. ../Dave (not writing as an Editor :-)