[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: first-last->queue and first-last->queue!

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 117 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 117 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.



Takashi Kato scripsit:

> * Aren't they a bit too much depending on the container implementation?*
> What should happen when the `front` and `back` are not in the same
> list?  - If implementations need to check, then it'd take O(n).

They are meant to be fast and unsafe, and I'll modify the SRFI to say so.

> Some trivial things (not related to subject):- 'Rationale' and
> 'Implementation' sections have `â€` (corruption or only me?)-
> 'Copyright' has `Â` (again only me?) _/_/

The 8859-1 header was added downstream from me.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@xxxxxxxx
Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN in any language.  --Ed Post