[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Predefined nfx considered harmful

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 105 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 105 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Thanks for the revision.   I'm going to implement it in Gauche
and try it out.

On 'nfx': I think your concern about users relying on
implementation-dependent extention inadvertently is reasonable.
My $.02 is that you just say "if an implementations claims it's
srfi-105, leave nfx unbound; if an implementation wants to put some
default meaning on nfx, call it something other than srfi-105."

Of course a srfi-105 implementation may supply a library that binds
nfx and let users load the library explicitly if they desire.