[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each

To: David Van Horn <dvanhorn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each
From: Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:51:38 -0700
Cc: srfi-101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <526047D5.6070404@ccs.neu.edu>
References: <52603F9B.9020906@bothner.com> <526047D5.6070404@ccs.neu.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8

A bug-let, I assume: In ra:for-each there is a call to tree-map/n
which should seems like it should be tree-for-each/n.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@xxxxxxxxxxx   http://per.bothner.com/

References:
- srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each
  - From: David Van Horn

Prev by Date: Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each
Next by Date: SRFI-101 ported to Kawa
Previous by thread: Re: srfi-101 reference implementation missing ra:for-each
Next by thread: SRFI-101 ported to Kawa
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread