[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: count

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 101 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 101 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Alexey Radul <axofch@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proposal: count
From: David Van Horn <dvanhorn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:24:34 -0400
Cc: srfi-101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <be5023640909201744t7b355d2auebd15a7d8f497618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4AB6B39E.3080001@xxxxxxxxxxx> <be5023640909201700r735c288bj701964db5d35ee6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AB6C31F.7000503@xxxxxxxxxxx> <be5023640909201744t7b355d2auebd15a7d8f497618@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)

Alexey Radul wrote:

improper-length ?  Or some variation on that?  For that matter, why
not specify length to accept improper lists, and invent a name for the
thing that signals an error if the list is improper?


Because that would cause confusion with R6's `length'.

David

References:
- Proposal: count
  - From: David Van Horn
- Re: Proposal: count
  - From: Alexey Radul
- Re: Proposal: count
  - From: David Van Horn
- Re: Proposal: count
  - From: Alexey Radul

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal: count
Next by Date: Reference implementation: portable and simplified
Previous by thread: Re: Proposal: count
Next by thread: Re: Proposal: count
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread