This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 101 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 101 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
> Aubrey Jaffer wrote: > > I think having SRFI-101 shadow R6RS identifiers is the most common way > > that SRFI-101 would be used. Is this true? Since srfi-101's data structure is incompatible to the built-in pairs, you can't pass srfi-101 list to the imported procedures that expects built-in list, and vice versa. (Or am I missing something?) If you import srfi-101 shadowing r6rs list primitives, you pretty much commit to live in srfi-101 world, isolated from other libraries that deal with native lists. That's ok for experimental work, but for practical applications I'd rather imagine that it'd be more common to import srfi-101 procedures with prefix, and the user converts normal lists and srfi-101 lists as needed. --shiro