This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 0 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 0 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
Many thanks, Marc, for the new draft. It's a definite improvement. From a first look (I'll have a second look tomorrow), I'd still like to suggest two things to be addressed: - Import of feature implementations (IMHO) *needs* to be made explicit. Scheme implementations which load additional features on-demand (such Scheme 48) would *have* to say NO to any feature requested. In the present form, there's little chance that Scheme implementations with such a design philosophy will adopt the present draft. - By now several Scheme implementors have expressed their preference for a separate configuration language. Richard, of course, Will, Donovan, and the Rice folks. Is there a strong reason *not* to do it this way? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla