[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SRFI naming

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI discuss from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI discuss contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Michael Sperber [Mr.  Preprocessor] <sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> We're going around in circles: Al is suggesting attaching variant
> numbers to the names. [...]

Which is likely to be 1 in nearly every case.

> What good are portable-across-implementation names if the module
> system you're using them in isn't portable? [...]

That's a separate problem which will hopefully be addressed by different
means.  At least, the naming could be used by srfi-0 for a file inside of
some sort of loading scaffold.