[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srfi names
Alex Shinn <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >>>>> "MJ" == MJ Ray <email@example.com> writes:
> MJ> How are you defining success? To me, CPAN tends to look rather
> MJ> like the librarians were asleep while stock intake occurred. If
> MJ> we can avoid that problem, we will have done well.
> Success in managing 3584 module names, and having those names mostly
> make sense and be easy to use.
Err... sensibility of the names and usability of the code are
orthogonal issues, aren't they?
> Success in a very convenient online search mechanism
This is addressable within the SRFI infrastructure
> and automated installation using those names.
This is *not*. Some SRFIs require changes to implementation run-times.
Communism is inequality, but not as property is. Property is
exploitation of the weak by the strong. Communism is exploitation of
the strong by the weak.
-- What is Property? (Pierre-Joseph Proudhon)