[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SRFI naming

To: srfi-discuss@rotkohl.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Subject: Re: SRFI naming
From: Dave Mason <dmason@sarg.ryerson.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 20:24:52 -0400
Delivered-To: srfi-discuss@rotkohl.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:53:40 PDT." <200208141653.JAA04492@radish.petrofsky.org>
User-Agent: EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6(中ノ庄 ) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (CuyahogaValley) (alpha-redhat-linux)

As another datapoint, there are well over 2000 RFCs and nobody that
I've heard of has a huge problem with that.  People know the ones they
care about.

SRFIs are somewhere between RFCs and modules.  But I don't actually
have a strong opinion either way.

../Dave

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SRFI naming
  - From: Alex Shinn <foof@synthcode.com>
- Re: SRFI naming
  - From: David Rush <kumo@bellsouth.net>

References:
- Re: SRFI naming
  - From: Alchemy Petrofsky <alchemy@petrofsky.org>

Prev by Date: Re: SRFI naming
Next by Date: Re: SRFI naming
Prev by thread: Re: SRFI naming
Next by thread: Re: SRFI naming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread