This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 98 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 98 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
> Will an implementation having getenv but not environ be SRFI-98 > compliant? I don't think so. > Although many useful Scheme programs have been written > using getenv; I have yet to see one which requires "environ". On CGI application, I want to check all the environ variables for debug usage. Some Web servers don't pass all the environment variables to CGI application. -- Taro Minowa(Higepon) http://www.monaos.org/ http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/ On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Aubrey Jaffer <agj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > | Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 19:06:16 +0900 > | From: higepon <higepon@xxxxxxxxx> > | > | Hi. > | > | > SRFI-96, SLIB Prerequisites, (requested finalization a month ago) > | > specifies single-argument GETENV compatibly with SRFI-98. Should > | > it be mentioned? > | > | When SRFI-98 becomes final status, will you revise SRFI-96? > > I can submit a revision (no guess as to how long it will take to > appear). SRFI-96 (and SLIB) will not be requiring the "environ" > behavior. Although many useful Scheme programs have been written > using getenv; I have yet to see one which requires "environ". > > Will an implementation having getenv but not environ be SRFI-98 > compliant? SRFI-98 would be a prerequisite for SRFI-96 only if the > answer to that question is yes. > > | > Also, I have added support for the no-argument getenv to the > | > development version of SCM > | > | Cool! > | This is the first implementation of this srfi! > > According to the table at the end of srfi-98, STklos preceeded SCM. > > | I read your code SCM scm_getenv(nam). > | Thanks. >