[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI-96 and SRFI-98
- To: "Aubrey Jaffer" <agj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: SRFI-96 and SRFI-98
- From: higepon <higepon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:56:44 +0900
- Cc: srfi-98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: srfi-98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=bL+zIIxi0eE0uwdPPUMpktgAWnYt2y9JSXdRI6Yk+BI=; b=VW6IbdOB6+nGqt0qAM+W5CLGSCPPrPETE0DOinC+JrQuXwrBJxAdNZ3H1D/EzqyipC /3BFJdJNUeaX6DWca74IS27GFtOhP1D5Ac9I5vM9bCGh/tuT86tZsqPhlcAAuowhXOqE +fKadCgqRh5R4zmzPb/L/xz0/Ira4v/Yi4fwA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=EKtpmKdgIy5ol0bw07LoGREfNRKmHgagIVFXmy1ojVcYJwuF1kaKcQ1dPYDsOW1U2G 1/1NZ/GaDGHaj+0irTPpMYC9Bh6dRhHQpHMBxbQm983Vpswh5Vp6w3gcRGjYKKtCXrmf 4zbuwa7dadpfQTM/gs/dNdTl2vzSihpo4+R1E=
- In-reply-to: <20080706204359.C455751D7D7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <f07386410807060306t162b2df1xffa863a0911040e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080706204359.C455751D7D7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Will an implementation having getenv but not environ be SRFI-98
> compliant?
I don't think so.
> Although many useful Scheme programs have been written
> using getenv; I have yet to see one which requires "environ".
On CGI application, I want to check all the environ variables for debug usage.
Some Web servers don't pass all the environment variables to CGI application.
--
Taro Minowa(Higepon)
http://www.monaos.org/
http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Aubrey Jaffer <agj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> | Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 19:06:16 +0900
> | From: higepon <higepon@xxxxxxxxx>
> |
> | Hi.
> |
> | > SRFI-96, SLIB Prerequisites, (requested finalization a month ago)
> | > specifies single-argument GETENV compatibly with SRFI-98. Should
> | > it be mentioned?
> |
> | When SRFI-98 becomes final status, will you revise SRFI-96?
>
> I can submit a revision (no guess as to how long it will take to
> appear). SRFI-96 (and SLIB) will not be requiring the "environ"
> behavior. Although many useful Scheme programs have been written
> using getenv; I have yet to see one which requires "environ".
>
> Will an implementation having getenv but not environ be SRFI-98
> compliant? SRFI-98 would be a prerequisite for SRFI-96 only if the
> answer to that question is yes.
>
> | > Also, I have added support for the no-argument getenv to the
> | > development version of SCM
> |
> | Cool!
> | This is the first implementation of this srfi!
>
> According to the table at the end of srfi-98, STklos preceeded SCM.
>
> | I read your code SCM scm_getenv(nam).
> | Thanks.
>