[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:SRFI-96 and SRFI-98
- To: srfi-98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re:SRFI-96 and SRFI-98
- From: higepon <higepon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 19:06:16 +0900
- Delivered-to: srfi-98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=Vku4Etc2bGZ4ZZxswZ5yAd9/Bnv4UK8G/jpRZwu1VT4=; b=fQaqHLGT5/rtZvQql12Z/krQqX4BHaOzSxfbr02apq0Bw/fGg3HxG30VB5ZMy9Yc+Y 2BtFjQljfdrozdYexggTDLmSue98qoaMpct8wiHYe8rwOfsXP05YHLT1diROfRkIgY96 Jju2JzD4O8b7/rDfTsxyVyh8oCBxgT56EIvjI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Shjc5NkIOtoSkFDvg/1cKOVgDTcezUZtOWfo5OFxa1Y/uY7Bv75GfrC8Y856CdwsIl F/juc1Syt049TvUBBIunUHuG2fLw5XHcA+MfsCOKHRUP3J/FXoogmpI0zD9Ef+2nJFkc HiPCEQyCIZVVbh/FGF5SR54AeRZyw96hCWE5s=
Hi.
> SRFI-96, SLIB Prerequisites, (requested finalization a month ago)
> specifies single-argument GETENV compatibly with SRFI-98. Should it
> be mentioned?
When SRFI-98 becomes final status, will you revise SRFI-96?
> Also, I have added support for the no-argument getenv to the
> development version of SCM
Cool!
This is the first implementation of this srfi!
I read your code SCM scm_getenv(nam).
Thanks.
--
Taro Minowa(Higepon)
http://www.monaos.org/
http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/