This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 98 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 98 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
So I'd say that either implementation doesn't belong in the document, or the SRFI function should be revised to permit compliant implementations to behave like that implementation does.
-- http://www.neilvandyke.org/