[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: David Van Horn <dvanhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:00:15 -0700
Cc: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, leppie <xacc.ide@xxxxxxxxx>, higepon <higepon@xxxxxxxxx>, y.fujita.lwp@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48867266.5070502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48867266.5070502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Abdulaziz.Ghuloum@xxxxxxx


On Jul 22, 2008, at 4:51 PM, David Van Horn wrote:

   - Ikarus
   - Larceny
   - PLT Scheme
   - Scheme 48


There's also ypsilon, mosh, and ironscheme which are said to be R6RS.
I don't know if their authors are subscribed to this list (they should).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: higepon

References:
- Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: David Van Horn

Prev by Date: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Next by Date: please, can't you reach an agreement?
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Next by thread: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread