Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS

To: David Van Horn <dvanhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:00:15 -0700
Cc: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, leppie <xacc.ide@xxxxxxxxx>, higepon <higepon@xxxxxxxxx>, y.fujita.lwp@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48867266.5070502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48867266.5070502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Abdulaziz.Ghuloum@xxxxxxx


On Jul 22, 2008, at 4:51 PM, David Van Horn wrote:

   - Ikarus
   - Larceny
   - PLT Scheme
   - Scheme 48


There's also ypsilon, mosh, and ironscheme which are said to be R6RS.
I don't know if their authors are subscribed to this list (they should).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: higepon

References:
- Consensus among implementors of R6RS
  - From: David Van Horn