Consensus among implementors of R6RS

[David Van Horn <dvanhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would like for the naming convention of the SRFI Libraries proposal to 
represent a consensus among implementors of R6RS-compatible systems.  I 
am aware of four:

   - Ikarus
   - Larceny
   - PLT Scheme
   - Scheme 48

If you are an implementor of one of these systems, could you let me know 
if the proposal is agreeable, i.e. are you likely to support it as a way 
of referencing SRFI libraries in your system?

If your answer is "no", would you explain why and what, if anything, 
could be done to make the proposal likely to be supported in your system?

If you are an implementor of an R6RS system I am not aware of, please 
tell me about your system and whether you would be willing to support 
this SRFI.

Thanks,
David