[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Consensus among implementors of R6RS

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

I would like for the naming convention of the SRFI Libraries proposal to represent a consensus among implementors of R6RS-compatible systems. I am aware of four:

   - Ikarus
   - Larceny
   - PLT Scheme
   - Scheme 48

If you are an implementor of one of these systems, could you let me know if the proposal is agreeable, i.e. are you likely to support it as a way of referencing SRFI libraries in your system?

If your answer is "no", would you explain why and what, if anything, could be done to make the proposal likely to be supported in your system?

If you are an implementor of an R6RS system I am not aware of, please tell me about your system and whether you would be willing to support this SRFI.