[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unbroken naming conventions

To: William D Clinger <will@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: unbroken naming conventions
From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:27:02 -0700
Cc: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum@xxxxxxxxx>, dvanhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mflatt@xxxxxxxxxxx, srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1KLMQJ-0004HJ-GX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1KLMQJ-0004HJ-GX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Abdulaziz.Ghuloum@xxxxxxx


On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:17 AM, William D Clinger wrote:

Mappings from
library names to file names are completely
implementation-dependent.  This creates a problem for
public repositories of SRFI reference implementations:
What naming convention should they use?


We can write a SRFI for this, right?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: unbroken naming conventions
  - From: David Van Horn

References:
- Re: unbroken naming conventions
  - From: William D Clinger

Prev by Date: Re: unbroken naming conventions
Next by Date: Re: unbroken naming conventions
Previous by thread: Re: unbroken naming conventions
Next by thread: Re: unbroken naming conventions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread