[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unbroken naming conventions
- To: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: unbroken naming conventions
- From: "Grant Rettke" <grettke@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:37:26 -0500
- Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=RSbsqTrUs6wuLPPZOR4OCKIwrsAvWeJQxGdUN/LXTLs=; b=KneQ+g4/+SPM4omG3YB3oPTWudKPMCS3DyJHyVJoMeTUYhkI8V+Hx+bglMTY81WdgM qXM/SxkAs55aklZQuqRr6SwWc6WomMHbDQUCN6YY8NG5eEZsZ5lxoRM8EqkNUOAtqWOr ZR0jA0KH1DNrd1IXJRg+EUWlNFYsZ0DP4YR1A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=euCIB8u56gxgsZ9QfjIFQVgRYbyRa0Q9VvhV1Rhk0lMWnnmdrF77h0/ZkMlVGm1b19 VO2c98VDArGKh011sgrsAvYnHNIFXduC7YSm9859P2WP+ftQ72LIrTFIc1aBDSCxa2d3 8Ry+sn9cc08LS78kL3Ja4AWJwMST9rnkWu0X4=
- In-reply-to: <20080722142643.37B0365009C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <E1KL9C6-0004yw-3m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4885EA7C.7070200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080722142643.37B0365009C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: grettke@xxxxxxxxx
(srfi :6) looks the best.
If you have to go with Windows friendly names, which consist of the following:
(srfi =6)
(srfi _6)
(srfi ~6)
then (srfi =6) looks the best.