[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unbroken naming conventions
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- To: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: unbroken naming conventions
- From: "Grant Rettke" <grettke@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:37:26 -0500
- Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=RSbsqTrUs6wuLPPZOR4OCKIwrsAvWeJQxGdUN/LXTLs=; b=KneQ+g4/+SPM4omG3YB3oPTWudKPMCS3DyJHyVJoMeTUYhkI8V+Hx+bglMTY81WdgM qXM/SxkAs55aklZQuqRr6SwWc6WomMHbDQUCN6YY8NG5eEZsZ5lxoRM8EqkNUOAtqWOr ZR0jA0KH1DNrd1IXJRg+EUWlNFYsZ0DP4YR1A=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=euCIB8u56gxgsZ9QfjIFQVgRYbyRa0Q9VvhV1Rhk0lMWnnmdrF77h0/ZkMlVGm1b19 VO2c98VDArGKh011sgrsAvYnHNIFXduC7YSm9859P2WP+ftQ72LIrTFIc1aBDSCxa2d3 8Ry+sn9cc08LS78kL3Ja4AWJwMST9rnkWu0X4=
- In-reply-to: <20080722142643.37B0365009C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <E1KL9C6-0004yw-3m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4885EA7C.7070200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080722142643.37B0365009C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: grettke@xxxxxxxxx
(srfi :6) looks the best.
If you have to go with Windows friendly names, which consist of the following:
(srfi =6)
(srfi _6)
(srfi ~6)
then (srfi =6) looks the best.