[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Broken naming convention

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: will@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Broken naming convention
From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:40:32 -0400
Cc: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1JewSP-00044R-0F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (will@xxxxxxxxxxx)
User-agent: IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/7.7.90.+

   Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:04:09 -0400
   From: William D Clinger <will@xxxxxxxxxxx>

   If the R6RS community insists upon pedantic conformance,
   then we should adopt the suggestion made by Olin Shivers
   (personal communication): use Roman numerals.

Uppercase or lowercase roman numerals?  (Or is it `Roman numerals'?
or `Roman Numerals'?)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Broken naming convention
  - From: David Van Horn

References:
- Re: Broken naming convention
  - From: William D Clinger

Prev by Date: SRFI 97 and R6RS implementers?
Next by Date: Re: Miscellanea
Previous by thread: Re: Broken naming convention
Next by thread: Re: Broken naming convention
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread