[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SRFI 97 and R6RS implementers?
- To: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: SRFI 97 and R6RS implementers?
- From: "Grant Rettke" <grettke@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:16:19 -0500
- Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=a8AnlrEApXjjzxmY4Gb6RxXpD+8EzlRVee1vRn283ZM=; b=C567jVWmheoFgkwksUkDEx/7ggLzkkgdgyub524Lfkmrp++4FXb2fNo7Q6VXnUvzVh5Qyh0Mrwe0Vf588gWMzc3enVVN1Jqnp5ikgDw6TpNRw8vNgT4h+qxYrZDCv9GS4AWAefoVGPFsjdZJrRH3alG2zhLcu/WWqcD5caTT/sU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=M8DSSPNX2JpqOvc1u7lCWjRXZ97sW+4yiibdiaPOmlyJYDsmu0oyWQMSSd1q88WXFkQ9cFgPA2VNCAqmdtBQBMxTIAXeCNR3itfVw1qsPLwYqQzPQS3sZkJ8dW3XgBs2oZGy2CP2dLEwbrFoZrf+zOzeD4jcc6wC7oP3olZhc5E=
- Sender: grettke@xxxxxxxxx
In light of the modularity offered by R6RS, are all of the R6RS
implementers planning on collaborating on a single set of R6RS SRFI
implementations and reusing them?
Was SRFI 97 driven as part of such an effort?