[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SRFI 97 and R6RS implementers?
This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 97 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 97 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
- To: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: SRFI 97 and R6RS implementers?
- From: "Grant Rettke" <grettke@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:16:19 -0500
- Delivered-to: srfi-97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=a8AnlrEApXjjzxmY4Gb6RxXpD+8EzlRVee1vRn283ZM=; b=C567jVWmheoFgkwksUkDEx/7ggLzkkgdgyub524Lfkmrp++4FXb2fNo7Q6VXnUvzVh5Qyh0Mrwe0Vf588gWMzc3enVVN1Jqnp5ikgDw6TpNRw8vNgT4h+qxYrZDCv9GS4AWAefoVGPFsjdZJrRH3alG2zhLcu/WWqcD5caTT/sU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=M8DSSPNX2JpqOvc1u7lCWjRXZ97sW+4yiibdiaPOmlyJYDsmu0oyWQMSSd1q88WXFkQ9cFgPA2VNCAqmdtBQBMxTIAXeCNR3itfVw1qsPLwYqQzPQS3sZkJ8dW3XgBs2oZGy2CP2dLEwbrFoZrf+zOzeD4jcc6wC7oP3olZhc5E=
- Sender: grettke@xxxxxxxxx
In light of the modularity offered by R6RS, are all of the R6RS
implementers planning on collaborating on a single set of R6RS SRFI
implementations and reusing them?
Was SRFI 97 driven as part of such an effort?