This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 95 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 95 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
| Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:52:04 +0100 | From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jens_Axel_S=F8gaard?= <email@example.com> | | The specification of sort! reads: | | | Function: sort! sequence less? | Function: sort! sequence less? key | | Returns list, array, vector, or string sequence which has | been mutated to order its elements according to less?. Given | valid arguments, it is always the case that: | | (sorted? (sort! sequence less?) less?) => #t | | Would be possible to add that the sorting is in-place? That is | guarantee, that no (or very little) extra memory is allocated | during the sorting process. I originally had language to limit allocation of pairs, but it required all sorts of caveats about the stack and other potential uses of pairs. I find no such language in R5RS; does any SRFI limit pair allocation? As W. Clinger points out, some things must be left to the quality-of-implementation.