Re: Or Alternatively ... ?

[Paul Schlie <schlie@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Paul Schlie <schlie@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>   (define some-values '(1 2 3))
>> 
>>   (+ . some-values) :: (+ 1 2 3) => 6
>> 
>>   (+ . some-values . '(10 20)) :: (+ 1 2 3 10 20) => 36
> 
> This syntax is not compatible with S-expressions.
> (it's not an external representation of data),
> so Scheme will not adopt it.

- Understood, however some simpler syntactic alternative
  to it's otherwise semantic equivalent would be nice, as:

    (eval `(+ ,@ some-values ,@ '(10 20))) => 36

  feels a bit cumbersome?

  (although correspondingly an alternative to the use of values ...)