This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 83 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 83 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Matthew Flatt wrote:
- It would be nice if the toplevel could also be considered an implicit library.Ok, but I'll stand firm on the top-level-doesn't-exist view of this particular SRFI.
Although the SRFI still says something about the toplevel. In particular, the statement it makes seems to be: "The toplevel cannot be considered a library", unless we change Scheme by having reserved words and disallow shadowing at the toplevel.This state of affairs may indeed be entirely reasonable, as long as it is intended.