[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions, loose ends, misprints, etc.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Matthew Flatt wrote:

Andre wrote:

- It would be nice if the toplevel could also be considered an implicit

Ok, but I'll stand firm on the top-level-doesn't-exist view of this
particular SRFI.

Although the SRFI still says something about the toplevel.  In particular,
the statement it makes seems to be:

  "The toplevel cannot be considered a library",

unless we change Scheme by having reserved words and disallow shadowing at the

This state of affairs may indeed be entirely reasonable, as long as it is intended.