[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: indirect-export in macro



At Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:13:54 -0500 (EST), Andre van Tonder wrote:
>  Ah, that too, but I meant that 
>  
>    <body> = <impexp-form>* <comdef-form>*
>  
>  requires the <impexp-form>s to precede the macro definitions. 

But `indirect-export' is a <comdef-form>, not an <impexp-form>.

The intent is that `indirect-export' declarations are mingled with
definitions, and that a macro might expand to a definition, a macro
definition, and an indirect export all at once.

Matthew