[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: indirect-export in macro

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 83 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 83 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

At Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:13:54 -0500 (EST), Andre van Tonder wrote:
>  Ah, that too, but I meant that 
>    <body> = <impexp-form>* <comdef-form>*
>  requires the <impexp-form>s to precede the macro definitions. 

But `indirect-export' is a <comdef-form>, not an <impexp-form>.

The intent is that `indirect-export' declarations are mingled with
definitions, and that a macro might expand to a definition, a macro
definition, and an indirect export all at once.