[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: syntactic tower?
Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:55:11 -0500 (EST), Andre van Tonder wrote:
> > It does not seem to distinguish the
> > meta-phases that occur when LET-SYNTAX is nested,
> I really should have caught this omission!
> I'll work on this and get back to you. I'm not yet sure what the
> resolution will be.
It is a tricky problem. I might point out that the module proposal
I have up at:
contains a reasonably comprehensive specification of one possible
resolution to just this issue, as well as a working prototype, that is
very similar in other respects to the current SRFI.
It is, of course, based on your published work, but handles the syntactic
tower issue similarly to Scheme48, which can nest FOR-SYNTAX
statements to effect imports into an arbitrary level. I suspect Chez can
do something similar with nested METAs, as your coauthor will be able to
confirm or deny.
------------- End Forwarded Message -------------