Per Bothner wrote:
Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
- sometimes many small libraries are best expressed in a single file,I think this is fairly rare, and not a very important use case. If they're small, why should they be separate libraries?
It is fairly common during development of a library to have small components separated in individual libraries. Per Bothner wrote: > Tony Garnock-Jones wrote: >> - sometimes many >> small libraries are best expressed in a single file, > > I think this is fairly rare, and not a very important use case. > If they're small, why should they be separate libraries? Since libraries in the context of this srfi is new "languages", a small library is needed to specify a language that differ only slightly from an existing language. > > and sometimes a >> single library is best expressed in multiple files.