[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: put library <body> at top-level

To: Ray Blaak <blaak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: put library <body> at top-level
From: Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:34:26 -0800
Cc: srfi-83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <438E28F4.5050400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <438E0CA1.5020406@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200511302144.jAULir5M098739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438E275D.6010006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <438E28F4.5050400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720)

Ray Blaak wrote:


[pros and cons]

Could we prototype either choice and see how it feels in practice?


Well, there is a lot of experience with module==file from Kawa.
Some of my Kawa users have pretty large Kawa code-bases.
I can ask them to recount their experience.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@xxxxxxxxxxx   http://per.bothner.com/

References:
- put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Matthew Flatt
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Ray Blaak

Prev by Date: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Next by Date: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Previous by thread: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Next by thread: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread