[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: put library <body> at top-level

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 83 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 83 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Ray Blaak <blaak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: put library <body> at top-level
From: Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:34:26 -0800
Cc: srfi-83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <438E28F4.5050400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <438E0CA1.5020406@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200511302144.jAULir5M098739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438E275D.6010006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <438E28F4.5050400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720)

Ray Blaak wrote:


[pros and cons]

Could we prototype either choice and see how it feels in practice?


Well, there is a lot of experience with module==file from Kawa.
Some of my Kawa users have pretty large Kawa code-bases.
I can ask them to recount their experience.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@xxxxxxxxxxx   http://per.bothner.com/

References:
- put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Matthew Flatt
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Ray Blaak

Prev by Date: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Next by Date: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Previous by thread: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Next by thread: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread