[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: put library <body> at top-level

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 83 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 83 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

To: Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: put library <body> at top-level
From: Ray Blaak <blaak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:34:28 -0800
Cc: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, srfi-83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <438E275D.6010006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <438E0CA1.5020406@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200511302144.jAULir5M098739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438E275D.6010006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)


[pros and cons]

Could we prototype either choice and see how it feels in practice?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Matthew Flatt
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner

Prev by Date: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Next by Date: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Previous by thread: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Next by thread: Re: put library <body> at top-level
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread