Re: put library <body> at top-level

To: Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: put library <body> at top-level
From: Ray Blaak <blaak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:34:28 -0800
Cc: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, srfi-83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: srfi-83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <438E275D.6010006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <438E0CA1.5020406@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200511302144.jAULir5M098739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438E275D.6010006@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)


[pros and cons]

Could we prototype either choice and see how it feels in practice?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Matthew Flatt
- Re: put library <body> at top-level
  - From: Per Bothner