[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Finality approaching
>>>>> "John" == John David Stone <stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
John> (1) Possibly one could find a better identifier than
I agree, but then you'd lose historical compatibility.
John> (3) RECEIVE duplicates the functionality of MzScheme's LET-VALUES,
John> which has a slightly different syntax, but this duplication is not
John> particularly harmful and accommodates a community in which RECEIVE is
John> already an established usage.
LET-VALUES should really be a separate SRFI. (That has its own
glitches, but so there.)
Yo, Matthias: prod, prod ...
John> So I'm proposing to let SRFI 8 become final in its original form.
I think so, too.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla