Re: Finality approaching

[sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])]

>>>>> "John" == John David Stone <stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

John>         (1) Possibly one could find a better identifier than
John>             RECEIVE

I agree, but then you'd lose historical compatibility.

John>         (3) RECEIVE duplicates the functionality of MzScheme's LET-VALUES,
John> which has a slightly different syntax, but this duplication is not
John> particularly harmful and accommodates a community in which RECEIVE is
John> already an established usage.

LET-VALUES should really be a separate SRFI.  (That has its own
glitches, but so there.)

Yo, Matthias: prod, prod ...

John>         So I'm proposing to let SRFI 8 become final in its original form.

I think so, too.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla