[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RECEIVE vs. LET-VALUES

To: Lars Thomas Hansen <lth@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RECEIVE vs. LET-VALUES
From: sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: 03 Jul 1999 16:10:16 +0200
Cc: stone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, srfi-8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Lars Thomas Hansen's message of "Fri, 02 Jul 1999 15:47:05 -0400"
References: <199907021947.PAA00847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: sperber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Why not turn LET-VALUES into a separate SRFI?  Both forms are in
fairly widespread use.  How about it, Lars?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RECEIVE vs. LET-VALUES
  - From: Lars Thomas Hansen

References:
- Re: RECEIVE vs. LET-VALUES
  - From: Lars Thomas Hansen

Prev by Date: Re: RECEIVE vs. LET-VALUES
Next by Date: Re: RECEIVE vs. LET-VALUES
Previous by thread: Re: RECEIVE vs. LET-VALUES
Next by thread: Re: RECEIVE vs. LET-VALUES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread