[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eq? issue

This page is part of the web mail archives of SRFI 76 from before July 7th, 2015. The new archives for SRFI 76 contain all messages, not just those from before July 7th, 2015.

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> If the '{<definitions>}' part of the type definition is omitted
> and all parameters are identifiers, the type is called a record type.
> This has the following consequences:

One more consequence: it's unspecified whether the constructor makes a
fresh object or reuses some other object of the same value. The compiler
takes advantage of this by allocating constant records statically.

   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/