[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eq? issue

To: srfi-76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Eq? issue
From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 02:12:59 +0100
Delivered-to: srfi-76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87k6dcdhh9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Marcin Kowalczyk's message of "Sat, 07 Jan 2006 01:11:46 +0100")
Mail-followup-to: srfi-76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0601040239320.562@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y9lbqyqy0kd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0601060942210.5508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87k6dcdhh9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> If the '{<definitions>}' part of the type definition is omitted
> and all parameters are identifiers, the type is called a record type.
> This has the following consequences:

One more consequence: it's unspecified whether the constructor makes a
fresh object or reuses some other object of the same value. The compiler
takes advantage of this by allocating constant records statically.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

References:
- Eq? issue
  - From: Andre van Tonder
- Re: Eq? issue
  - From: Michael Sperber
- Re: Eq? issue
  - From: Andre van Tonder
- Re: Eq? issue
  - From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk

Prev by Date: Re: Eq? issue
Next by Date: Opacity considered harmful [was Re: Revised SRFI-76 (R6RS Records) draft]
Previous by thread: Re: Eq? issue
Next by thread: Re: Eq? issue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread