[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accessor visibility
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Michael Sperber wrote:
Andre van Tonder <andre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Just a small question: Are the accessors visible in the protocol <exp>?
Yes. This is implied by the fact that the accessors are defined in
the environment of the DEFINE-RECORD-TYPE form.
We actually spent a fair amount of time on the wording spelling out
how the names are bound---i.e. that DEFINE-RECORD-TYPE expands into a
bunch of DEFINEs without saying that it expands into a bunch of
DEFINEs. If you could suggest on how to improve the spec, that would
be a great help.
Ah, sorry. On second reading, I realized that this is indeed specified